

A. S. R. S.

14TH JANUARY 1910

A. S. R. S.

28TH JANUARY 1910
Railway accident on the
L.B.S.C.R.

Stoats Nest 28th January 1910
Involving Brighton Driver John Thompsett & Fireman unknown
SEE SUB PAGE

A. S. R. S.

4TH FEBRUARY 1910

PHOTOGRAPHER UNKNOWN
APPROACHING LONDON BRIDGE 1910

A. S. R. S.

11TH FEBRUARY 1910
ELECTRIFICATION EXTESION
With the success of the electrification of the South London line the L.B.S.C.R were planning to electrify to Brighton using electric locomotives for their express services. But immediate priority was given to the suburban routes. Conversion of routes to Crystal Palace from both London Bridge and Victoria was decided upon in July 1910 with electrification operating between Victoria and Crystal Palace on the 1st June 1911.

A. S. R. S.
18TH FEBRUARY 1910

The pictorial representations upon the certificate are designed to tell the story of the development of the means of locomotion, with which the Society is so intimately connected, from its earliest stage to its present advanced position. Honour is fully given to the two men whose genius so largely contributed to this development. On the left is shown a portrait of James Watt, the Scotch mechanician, who by his improvements upon the invention of Thomas Neweomer, a Dartmouth locksmith (the first user of steam as a motive power), so regulated the action of the Steam Engine as to make it capable of being applied to the finest and most delicate manufactures, and whose son, James Watt, made, in 1817, the engines of the first steam vessel which sailed from an English port.
On the right, appropriately appears a portrait of George Stephenson, the self-educated colliery fireman, who by his powerful genius became the founder of the great school of railway engineering.
Representative figures of Driver and Fireman are shown in fraternal greeting on the footplate of the Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire Railway Co.'s Engine No, 431.
Immediately above these portraits is seen "The Rocket," the winner of the £500 prize for a locomotive engine, to be used on the Manchester and Liverpool Railway; this, the first locomotive, was constructed by George Stephenson, and is now a national monument in the South Kensington Museum. This rude engine is brought into strong contrast with the wonderfully developed engines now in use, which are represented by a Great Northern Express, an express passenger train on the London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway, and a Great Northern Piccadilly and Brompton Electric Tube Train.
The Certificate is also graced with emblematic figures of Justice, Agriculture and Commerce. Hercules, the symbol of individual strength, with lion couchant in subjection to him, and Vulcan, more usefully employed in forging couple-chains than thunder-bolts.
A Bee-hive is also introduced, as a type of the industry and united action of the members of the Association; and the peace and harmony existing amongst them find fit emblems in two harmless doves.
The Certificate also shows the way in which the hindrances to communion and commerce, arising from the long distances between centres of population, are now practically annihilated, by illustrations of the modes in which communication is kept up between manufacturing, mining, and other inland industries, and the shipping ports, and, through the latter, with all the accessible parts of the known world.
The possessor of this Certificate is therefore reminded by it of the important part which he, as a member of the "Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen," individually plays in the vast chain of intercourse between man and man the wide world over, and upon which all progress in Art, Science and Literature, and the diffusion of the advantages of civilization, largely depends; as well as in the multitudinous exchanges of commerce, the source of commercial prosperity and well-being of our nation, and lacking which, life itself in our large communities could not be sustained.
Mark Organ donation (June 2023) purchased this draw of the updated membership certificate, at a antique fair.
The certificate has been donated it to the A.S.L.E.&F. Head Office collection.

A. S. R. S.

11TH MARCH 1910
BATTERSEA
The usual meeting held on the 4th inst.
The delegates of the L.B.&S.C. loco. men gave a report upon the efforts made re the displacement of steam enginemen and firemen by the electrification of the South London line, stating that no satisfaction could be obtained.
Driver Packham with his Fireman
and their engine No. 47 Canada at Haywards Heath in 1910
(loco shed unknown)

A. S. R. S.

18TH MARCH 1910

A. S. R. S.

6TH MAY 1910

A. S. R. S.

3RD JUNE 1910


A. S. R. S.

13TH MAY 1910

A. S. R. S.

17TH JUNE 1910

A. S. R. S.

24TH JUNE 1910

A. S. R. S.

8TH JULY 1910

A. S. R. S.

15TH JULY 1910

A. S. R. S.

22ND JULY 1910
BRIGHTON
ENGINE CLEANERS c1910
Extracted & adapted from the book
By Fred Rich
Yesterday Once More
When two cleaners were put to work on the same engine, each cleaner would look after his
own half of the engine and the longitudinal line was their common boundary. It was a firmly
established tradition that the senior cleaner would clean the driver’s side while the junior
cleaner would clean the fireman’s side. On the Brighton engines the driver occupied the left-
hand side of the cab and this was known as ‘the lever side’ because the reversing wheel or
lever was located there: the fireman’s side of the engine was referred to as ‘the donkey side’
because the Westinghouse ‘donkey pump’ was normally mounted in a suitable position on that side.
On nights when most of the engines were on shed, they stood in long rows, buffer to buffer.
They were arranged (as nearly as possible) according to the order in which they would leave
next morning, but mean while it was totally impractical to move them. While they stood there, during the night, their cleaners went over them very thoroughly; but in many cases it was impossible to clean the upper most parts of the coupled wheels, these being up out of reach behind the splashers or inside the tanks. In due course, when the engine was movable, it would be positioned with the uncleaned areas of the wheel down at the bottom, this was
commonly know as 'half-turns'. Then, if the night cleaners were still on duty they would finish the job; otherwise the cleaners on day-work would be called along to do it.
The night cleaners were on piecework and received a fixed payment for any given task – so
much for cleaning a set of motion, another amount for cleaning a tender and so on.
From time to time a cleaner would also be sent out with a calling-up job. It might be that a
certain driver was due to book on at (say) 4 a.m. and he had requested a call at 3.15 a.m., so
the foreman would come looking for a cleaner to run the errand.
Even if the cleaner’s work was passed by the foreman it still might fail to satisfy the driver
when he came in the next morning.
In the preparation of his engine he had to go underneath the engine with his oil-can and if he
found any dirt – or worse still, soiled his clean overalls – he was likely to go to the foreman
and complain.
The day time cleaners would be required to clean goods engines which at returned from their night time work. The goods engine did not have any regular cleaners unlike the passenger engines. Another job for the daytime cleaners was to wheelbarrow coal from the loco yard to the East side of the station to keep a small reserve of coal for the engines that were working on the Kemp Town branch line.
By standing arrangements there was always an engine-cleaner would be ‘on loan’ to the
offices of the locomotive headquarters which were situated in the locomotive works at
Brighton. The duties which they performed were those of a messenger lad cum general office assistant. An engine cleaner for this assignment would require to be intelligent and of a smart appearance and they would normally serve in this capacity for a spell of twelve to eighteen months.

FRED RICH COLLECTION
New Cross Engine Cleaners c1910,
this engine was allocated to New Cross driverer Henry Holdbrook
BECOMING A FIREMAN
Extracted & adapted from the book
By Fred Rich
Yesterday Once More
A newly "Passed Cleaner" could expect a long wait for the future firman's vacancy which would bring his appointment. A "Passed Cleaner" could wait could last two, three or four years, possibly even longer to get his promotion: and during that time the "Passed Cleaner” was a spare man, notching up only the occasional firing trip to begin with. Then, as time went by, he would be called out more frequently, say once or twice a week and he eventually he would be out firing almost every day as he approached the head of his queue for a vacancy. Meanwhile he was paid 3/9d only for firing turns, and 3/3 for all those days which he would spent "on shed." The difference of 15% was quite significant and the ambition of every "Passed Cleaner” was to complete 313 firing turns - an achievement which qualified him for the fireman's rate of 3/9d even though he was still unappointed. This figure of 313 was great significance to every generation of firemen right down to the end of steam, and continued through to the end of the second-man's grade (the second-man's grade ceased 2nd October 1988): it represented one year of working days (i.e. 365 days minus the 52 Sundays).
If a "Passed Cleaners" was consistenly bad he soon acquired a certain stigma; and when a firing turn cropped up some of the drivers began to demur - "I'am not taking him!" But if you were in shaping up well as a firman you began to be talked about among the drivers - and then you got plenty of firing jobs! It was this kind of reputation which, in later years, could take a first rate, experience firman to his place among the elite. In those days, unlike later times, seniority was not the only factor which determined a man's progress up through the different classes of work. A really good driver would be given one of the top locomotives handling prestige passenger trains, while a less adequate man might remain on secondary passenger services, goods work or even on shunting duties. By the same token, no driver wanted to work with mediocre fireman, but the really good firemen were in great demand. The top drivers wielded a lot more influence and were able to choose from those senior firemen who were most highly regarded. And of course, if a driver kept telling his colleagues " My mate can do this, my mate can do that!", then his mate was likely to be 'snapped up!'
PHOTOGRAPHER UNKNOWN
THE FIREMAN'S HELMET
Extracted & adapted from the book
By Fred Rich
Yesterday Once More
When a "Passed Cleaners" completed 313 turns (or when he received his appointment, which ever came first) he was issued with an engine man's cap to signify that he had "made the grade". These caps - or "helmets" as they were called on the L.B.S.C.R. These helmets were not cheap costing 7/6d which was considerable sum of money. It is understood that the
railway company didn't have to pay for the engine men's helmets: they were purchased from a fund bequeathed by the late Sir Julian Goldsmid, a former Deputy Chairman of the
L.B.S.C.R. In acknowledgement of Sir Julian's generosity and prestige, the engine men’s
copper cap badge portrayed Billinton D3 Tank locomotive No. 363 'Goldsmid'. It was
traditional for a “Passed Cleaners" to provide his own head-wear until he qualified for a
'helmet' by completing 313 firing turns. The make-shift garment was usually a cloth cap,
probably the same one which its owner had worn when he was a cleaner.

A. S. R. S.

12TH AUGUST 1910

A. S. R. S.

26TH AUGUST 1910
Railway accident on the
L.B.S.C.R.

A. S. R. S.

2ND SEPETMBER 1910

A. S. R. S.

9TH SEPETMBER 1910

A. S. R. S.

16TH SEPETMBER 1910

A. S. R. S.

23RD SEPETMBER 1910

A. S. R. S.

30TH SEPETMBER 1910

A. S. R. S.

14TH OCTOBER 1910

A. S. R. S.

28TH OCTOBER 1910
LOCOMOTIVE JOURNAL
Extracted and adapted from
A.S.L.E.F. Organising Secretary W. Warwick's report
Events that took place from mid November 1910
I also visited our Battersea Branch and saw the secretary on an important matter affecting the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway men, and the following day attended a delegate" meeting in the afternoon, at New Cross, and in the evening a meeting belonging to our Westminster Branch. The delegate meeting at New Cross should have consisted of the old delegation mentioned in my last report, but the A.S.R.S. members of that body were conspicuous by their absence on this occasion, although they had been summoned by the corresponding secretary. The tactics throughout this business, by those who have endeavoured to make it a society question rather than the uplifting of the men, have practically nullified the efforts put forth to improve the position, and ought to be a lesson to all locomotive-men on the folly of being in a society which has to resort to such methods to keep the few locomotive-men they have.
I was also able to attend this and on arriving home again found a wire from our Brighton
Secretary, informing me of a fatal accident had occurred at locomotive shed there, which
required my attention. Needles to say I lost no time getting on the road again the last
mentioned places.
* Locomotive Journal,
January 1911

A. S. R. S.

25TH NOVEMBER 1910
LOCOMOTIVE JOURNAL
Extracted and adapted from
A.S.L.E.F. Organising Secretary W. Warwick's report
I returned home on the Monday 28th, November 1910 and found instructions awaiting
me from the General Office to attend a Board of Trade, inquiry, at Battersea Park
Station, on the following morning (Tuesday 29th). I attended to this and had scarcely
reached home in the evening were I received a post card from our Battersea secretary
asking me to attend a further Board of Trade inquiry at the locomotive shed on the
following day (Wednesday 30th). I was also able to attend this and on arriving home
again found a wire from our Brighton secretary, informing me a fatal accident had
occurred at the locomotive shed there, which required my attention. Needless to say I
lost no time in getting on the road again for the last mentioned place.
The inquiry at Battersea Park Station was with regard to a fatal accident to one of the
men employed on the fixing of pillars, &c, for the electrification of the railway. The
evidence went to prove that no blame was attached to anyone but the poor fellow
himself, who, after being warned of the approach of the train, walked away from the
others with his back to the train, the engine of which struck him in the side, causing
injuries which proved fatal.
* Locomotive Journal,
January 1911
LOCOMOTIVE JOURNAL
Extracted and adapted from
A.S.L.E.F. Organising Secretary W. Warwick's report
The inquiry Wednesday 30th, (November) 1910 in the locomotive shed was to ascertain the cause of the fatal accident to a man who was working with the joiners employed repairing the shed; it seemed he had gone for a piece of timber and on returning, attempted to pass between wagons which stood a few feet apart, and while doing so they were closed up, pinning him between the buffers. Here, again, this act of indiscretion cost the poor fellow his life, but in neither case were our men to blame. The sad case at Brighton differed somewhat, inasmuch as an aged driver was the victim. It appears Charles Ford, driver, on arriving at the shed, went at once to see the duty sheet to ascertain his working for the next day, this being necessary in order that he may turn his engine, or otherwise, before booking off; on returning he by some means was knocked down and run over by an engine being shunted for proper stabling. It was dark at the time and no one actually saw the occurrence, and the only intimation the driver of the engine had was the hearing of a groan; he stopped at once, only to find poor Ford had been rolled up under the engine and his legs run over, injuries to which he succumbed on the way to the hospital.
I attended the inquest next day (Thursday), December 1st, when the verdict was
"accidental death," no one in any way being to blame. One sad feature about the case
was he had done some 40 years in the service and had only a few months longer to work
before being entitled to superannuation.
* Locomotive Journal,
January 1911
I attended the inquest next day (Thursday), December 1st, when the verdict was
"accidental death," no one in any way being to blame. One sad feature about the case
was he had done some 40 years in the service and had only a few months longer to work
before being entitled to superannuation.
* Locomotive Journal,
January 1911

A. S. R. S.

9TH DECEMBER 1910
LOCOMOTIVE JOURNAL
Extracted and adapted from
A.S.L.E.F. Organising Secretary W. Warwick's report
LOCOMOTIVE JOURNAL
Extracted and adapted from
A.S.L.E.F. Organising Secretary W. Warwick's report
I attended the inquest next day (Thursday), December 1st, when the verdict was
"accidental death," no one in any way being to blame. One sad feature about the case
was he had done some 40 years in the service and had only a few months longer to work
before being entitled to superannuation.
* Locomotive Journal,
January 1911

A. S. R. S.

16TH DECEMBER 1910
LOCOMOTIVE JOURNAL
Extracted and adapted from
A.S.L.E.F. Organising Secretary W. Warwick's report
LOCOMOTIVE JOURNAL
Extracted and adapted from
A.S.L.E.F. Organising Secretary W. Warwick's report
On December 17th 1910, I arranged for, and attended, an open meeting at Brighton. We had a nice little company present, and perhaps the secretary will tell us, in the whether it has borne fruit or not. Whatever the result may be, I want to tell the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway locomotive-men, there is plenty of room for improvement. Our meeting was affected in numbers by the fact that members of a deputation were giving a report elsewhere of an interview with the “powers that be re electrification." This very fact spells weakness, and until the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway locomotive-men can rise to the occasion by joining their own Society, and move as one body for improved conditions of service, the much-desired and deserved improvement is not likely to come their way; a hint is as good as a nod, so I hope the Brighton men understand, and will act accordingly.
* Locomotive Journal,
February 1911